Program would be phased out in lower 48 states by 2013
10:00 PM, Feb. 16, 2011 |
A Delta flight takes off for Minneapolis in January at Watertown Municipal Airport. Commercial flights to Watertown are subsidized by the Essential Air Service program. / elisha page / argus leader
Written by JOAN LOWY Associated Press
WASHINGTON – Subsidies for air service to small airports would be almost eliminated and spending on aviation programs scaled back under a bill approved Wednesday by a House committee.
The Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted 34-25, mostly along party lines, for a Republican-written bill that establishes and renews Federal Aviation Administration programs through Sept. 30, 2014.
The bill would eliminate most of the $200 million Essential Air Service program, which pays airlines to provide scheduled service to 155 communities. The bill would phase out the program in the lower 48 states by 2013.
After that, only subsidies for service to airports in Alaska would be continued.
In South Dakota, two communities benefit from EAS money. Great Lakes Airlines receives $1.7 million a year in federal subsidies to fly into Huron, while Mesaba Airlines receives $1.3 million to serve Watertown, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Brookings had service through the program until it was discontinued partially because of low passenger volumes.
In the Senate, Arizona Republican John McCain has proposed totally eliminating the program, calling it a test of lawmakers’ commitment to cut government spending.
A 2009 Government Accountability report said demographic shifts were decreasing the population of some communities served by the program. The report said that on average just more than a third of the seats were filled on subsidized flights. For commercial flights nationwide, the average was 80 percent.
Lawmakers from rural districts say airline service is critical to rural communities in attracting and retaining businesses that generate jobs.
The subsidy program “is a vital lifeline between rural communities and the global network of commerce,” Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., the committee’s top Democrat, said. “Small and rural communities have grown up around (the program), which directly supports local jobs.”
The bill also would roll back annual FAA spending to $14.7 billion for each of the next three years – the same level as 2008 – in keeping with GOP promises to shrink government.
Democrats predict the spending decreases will lead to cutbacks and cancellations in the air traffic modernization program. FAA has estimated the program will cost the government as much as $22 billion through 2025. Airlines would have to spend as much as $20 billion more to install equipment in their planes.
California Aviation Alliance: Airport News List E-mail
Sent by AviaEd@netscape.net – Lorena de Rodriguez on behalf of CAA subscribers. Add your comments to these stories realtime online at http://aviaed.wordpress.com/.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the Airport News List, send an email, from the email account you wish to receive or discontinue CAA posts on, addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org and place only the following in the first line of the body of the message: Subscribe airport YourFirstName YourLastName YourJobTitle YourAirport/Company
Manage your CAA subscriptions with the user friendly Mail List Administration database. You’ll find it at: http://californiaaviation.org/cal/index.cfm
Contact email@example.com with problems with your subscription.